Theoretical Considerations
In the early days, the
flow of polymeric materials was not well understood. However, due
to the increasing demands on plastic materials and molding machines,
it is becoming essential to be able to make reliable quantitative
predictions about performance.
Mechanism of Flow in
Extruder
The plastic melts as
it moves along with the screw. As the screw rotates inside the barrel,
the movement of the plastic along the screw is dependent on whether
or not it adheres to the screw and barrel. In theory, there exist
two extremes:
- The material sticks
to the screw only and therefore the screw and material rotate
as a solid cylinder inside the barrel- This produces zero output
and is undesirable.
- The material slips
on the screw and has a high resistance to rotation inside the
barrel- This produces a purely axial movement of the melt and
is the ideal situation.
In general, the material
adheres to both the screw and the barrel.
The useful output from
the extruder is the result of:
- A drag
flow due to the interaction of the rotating screw and stationary
barrel. This is equivalent to the flow of a viscous liquid between
two parallel plates when one plate is stationary and the other
is moving.
- A pressure
flow due to the pressure gradient which is built up along
the screw. Since the high pressure is at the end of the extruder,
the pressure flow will reduce the output.
- A back flow (called
leakage) due to the clearance between the screw and the barrel.
This clearance allows material to leak back along the screw and
effectively reduces the output. This leakage will be worse when
the screw becomes worn.
The thermal processes
in the extruder fall somewhere between two ideals:
- Adiabatic process:
The system is fully insulated to prevent heat gain or loss from
or to the surroundings. This ideal state is reached if the work
done on the melt produces just the right amount of heat without
the need for heating or cooling.
- Isothermal process:
The temperature at all points is the same. This requires immediate
heating or cooling from the barrel to compensate for any loss
or gain of the heat in the melt.
Analysis of Flow in
Extruder
We present a Newtonian
analysis of the flow of material during the extrusion process. It
is important to note that most of polymer melts are Non-Newtonian,
and that the assumption of constant viscosity can lead to serious
errors in some cases. The purpose of this simplified discussion
is to illustrate the approach to the problem with little mathematical
complexity. For further information, we refer the reader to Crawford
in his book " Plastics Engineering."
 |
| |
 |
| Fig 1. Fluid element
ABCD in the flow between a stationary plate and a moving plate |
Drag Flow
For the small element
of fluid ABCD the volume flow rate dQ is given by:
If the velocity gradient
is assumed to be linear, we get:
Substituting in the expression
for the volumetric flow and integrating over the channel depth H,
we get the total drag flow:
Hence,
We are interested in
the fluid flow in the extruder as it is dragged along by the relative
movement of the screw and barrel.
 |
| Fig
2. Details of extruder screw |
The terms in the expression
for Qd relevant to the extruder dimensions are:
Vd =
DN cos |
Where N is the screw
speed, and
So
Qd
= (1/2).(
D tan -e).[ DN
(cos )2]
H |
If e is small compared
to ( D
tan ), we get
Pressure Flow
Let P be the pressure
and d be the shear
stress acting on the fluid element ABCD in fig1. Hence, the forces
acting on that element are:
 |
| F2
= P. dy dx |
F3
= d dz
dx |
For steady flow, the
element is in static equilibrium and the balance of forces gives:
Substituting for F1
,F2 and F3 we
get the following differential equation:

Integrating the above
equation to give the shear stress at any distance y from the centerline:

Hence,

For a Newtonian fluid,
the shear stress, y
, is related to the viscosity, ,
and the shear rate, ,
by the equation:

Substituting,

and integrating,

Hence,

Now, the volume flow
rate is given by:
Substituting for V and
integrating to get the pressure flow, Qp:

For the case shown in
fig2, where the fluid element is between the two flights, assuming
e is small, T is approximated by:
Also,

So,

Finally, the expression
for Qp becomes:

Source: Crawford,
Plastics Engineering.
|